Secrets Hidden in Plain Sight:Discover What You've Been Missing

4. Pay for One; Get One Free

Advertisement

When you purchase a charger with a USB port the next time, attempt to verify whether it is as described. Though this manufacturer believes differently, one would have assumed that the double USB port would be a benefit. The scenario this book describes offers a fascinating case study of product design that begs issues regarding production techniques, consumer expectations, and the ethical behavior of product presentation. "Next time you buy a charger with a USB port, try and check to confirm if it is what it says it is," the book advises readers, stressing the need for consumers to be more alert and critical in their choices, especially with regard to electronic equipment like chargers. The scenario shown centers on a charger that seems to have two USB ports but actually only one is operational. According to the book, "one would have thought that the double USB port is an advantage, but this manufacturer thinks otherwise." This interesting case involving appearance and utility calls for more research. A charger with two USB ports would initially look to be helpful to consumers. Many people in our linked world own several devices that need USB charging. By allowing two devices to be charged concurrently, a dual-port charger provides the ease of use that might help to minimize clutter and the demand for several chargers. This supposed advantage could even help justify a higher product price point. Still, the reality of the matter is somewhat different. The book exposes, "Here they are, hiding the second port and making us wonder whether it is cheaper to make two and hide one instead of making just one." This comment emphasizes the perplexing character of the manufacturer's choice. Producing a product with a feature meant to be non-functional appears contradictory. This scenario begs many issues about decisions and manufacturing techniques. Is it really less expensive to design and build a charger with two ports and disable one than to create a single-port charger? If so, what elements help to explain this economy of cost? Although some goods just need one port, it is more cost-effective to create a single type of casing with two port apertures if the manufacturer employs a common casing for several items. From a customer standpoint, this concealed port scenario seems deceptive. Consumers buying what looks to be a dual-port charger would fairly expect both ports to be operational. Finding out one port is non-functional could cause disappointment and a feeling of dishonesty. This can sour customer confidence and compromise the manufacturer's reputation. One should also take the ethical issues of this design decision into consideration. Selling a product with a non-functional feature—assuming it's not specifically promoted as having two operational ports—may not be unlawful, but it surely begs issues regarding openness and honest marketing policies. Unless stated otherwise, consumers usually assume the obvious characteristics of a good to be functional. This scenario also addresses more general consumer electronics and product design concerns. Making goods with purposefully non-functional components seems wasteful in a time when electronic garbage is a major issue. It violates ideas of effective design and resource economy, even if the extra components required are few. Moreover, this scenario emphasizes the need for customer knowledge and critical analysis of products. Given the abundance of different electronic accessories—often from less-known companies—it becomes imperative for consumers to confirm their performance. This instance reminds us that appearances can be misleading and that it is advisable to spend some time carefully testing and reviewing new products. The funny remark in the book, "whether it is cheaper to make two and hide one instead of making just one," suggests a general doubt about manufacturing techniques and cost-cutting strategies. Customers are growing more conscious of and worried about the strategies businesses could employ to cut expenses, occasionally at the expense of honesty or quality of products. This scenario also begs issues regarding the control of regulations in the market for electronic accessories. Should labeling rules or tougher standards help to stop such possibly deceptive designs? Alternatively, is it mostly the duty of consumers to be informed and vigilant? Ultimately, this story of the charger with a hidden connection offers a remarkable microcosm of more general problems in consumer electronics, manufacturing techniques, and consumer rights. It emphasizes the requirement of consumer knowledge, the need for openness in product design and marketing, and the complicated interaction among manufacturing expenses, product functioning, and consumer expectations. Cases like this remind us of the constant requirement for critical analysis of the goods we use in our everyday lives as technology develops and the market for electronic accessories expands.